Reflecting on my interviewing style (4)

I’ve done 3 interviews for In Full Flow now and I’m starting to see differences between the conversations that emerge from my way of interviewing. I wrote about introverts yesterday and I started thinking on how the interviews were different in that respect.

Lilia’s interview was very reflective on her life and how things could be related (she’s an introvert) , Henriette was just talking about what happened in her life (she’s an extravert) and Peter was somewhere in between, albeit more on the reflective side.

I started out each interview without a clear goal. There are some general topics that I want to address in the interview, but I’m not working towards a conclusion in the conversation.

The question I asked myself last night was whether this approach is a proper one. Do I get the most out of my interviews going in with a relatively blank slate? Should I have different interview strategies for different personalities? What is the better strategy research wise?

What do you think?

(about the number in the title)

(I cross-posted this article on In Full Flow)

This entry was posted in work and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

2 Comments

  1. Posted November 27, 2009 at 6:57 pm | Permalink

    Still wondering if I am an introvert :)

  2. Posted November 28, 2009 at 7:43 pm | Permalink

    This is a test refered to in the article on VK Banen (in English!)

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>