Subscribe
Read my book!
About this blog

This is my personal blog which I started in 2003. At first it was called Communigations, a variation on Communicative Investigations. The blog transformed itself more into a personal investigation than being a blog on communication and therefore needed a new name.As a fencer, the name of this blog reflects how I write my thoughts into coherent stories, fence them off from all the sidepaths and rapidly go back and forth, covering various topics that interest me.
Read more about me or about my work at elminewijnia.eu
-
Recent Conversation
-
Recent Writing
Fresh from Vimeo
Fresh from Flickr
Tags
backchannel behaviour bigprojectfor2009 birthday blogging coaching communication documentary ebook enschede ereader europeanparliament fablab fencing geeklounge howto infullflow inspiration interviews language learning music newyear next09 protospace reboot11 routines selfreflecting shift shift2010 shiftconf skallagrigg snow switzerland think09 thinkaboutit ton40 toolkit tools unconference video walchwil website winter wstmArchives

Ask questions, stupid!
Now that we’re in the midst of a financial crisis (in hundred years time we’ll know if it’s THE crisis of this century) I’ve had to let go of some of my naievity. Reading Noami Klein’s Shock Doctrine started it, reading more and more articles on how Wall Street functioned peels off more layers.
Rob referred to an article by Michael Lewis, someone who left Wall Street in the eighties, still in the earliest stages of his career and wrote a book about his experience. It took two decades longer for Wall Street to collapse than he thought it would. It is a story similar to Rob’s own experience.
Michael Lewis:
I’m shocked to hear about people too young to have decent experience, getting responsible for amounts of money beyond imagination. In an interview programme on Dutch public TV Nick Leeson, the guy who bankrupted Barings Bank back in 1995 admitted that he was too young and didn’t know what he was doing. He was able to get money to play with, without being asked by the people in London how he was using it exactly. He was able to hide all his losses in Singapore.
I’m wondering what we need to learn from this situation. There have been plenty of people that knew the system was corrupt and
spoke about it, but the rest of the people involved ignored those voices. Is
there a way that we can incorporate having opposing voices into society’s systems?
One lesson that we could learn is that we should trust more on what the Dutch would call ‘Gezond
Boerenverstand’ (literally translates as: Healthy Farmers
Intelligence). If you know you’re smart and you don’t understand what
exactly is happening, you should be suspicious. If you’re suspicious,
start observing and asking yourself and the people around you questions. You’ll
probably notice more people who are running around clueless. Then, make the effort to mobilise those people and create a bigger voice together.
(Just my €0,02)